grayuf.blogg.se

This intention betrays the will of well-meaning people who think that technology could end human suffering. They were not interested in raising people’s standards of living (Orwell 3). He said such people (only) wanted to “experiment” with these machines by starting wars. Using this logic, he opposed the view of modern warfare proponents who advocated for the use of advanced machinery to bring world order (Orwell 10). He also explored how societies could use technological innovations to change people’s standards of living (Orwell 10). Orwell (10) explained most of his beliefs on income inequality through “war perspectives.” Particularly, he paid a close attention to the role of technology in changing modern warfare techniques. This way, societies would be “more equal.” Why Increased Information Flow and Technology Could Reduce Income Inequality

However, to do so, people need to embrace new technology because it decreases information exchange barriers. Using the arguments of two authors, Orwell (3) and Huxley (1), in 1984 and Brave New World, this paper argues that free information flow could decrease the gap between the rich and the poor. Consequently, societies understand the need to decrease the gap between the rich and the poor. Regardless of a person’s view on this matter, there is little disagreement about the negative effects of “too much” income inequality. Some say inequality is good for attracting investments, while others believe it undermines social cohesion.